top of page

The NLRB and Social Media

  • Writer: Brikener Jean-Giles
    Brikener Jean-Giles
  • Jan 30, 2022
  • 4 min read

The National Labor Relations Act protects the rights of employees to act together to address conditions at work, with or without a union. This protection extends to certain work-related conversations conducted on social media, such as Facebook and Twitter.


The National Labor Relations Act protects the rights of employees to act together to address conditions at work, with or without a union. This protection extends to certain work-related conversations conducted on social media, such as Facebook and Twitter.


In 2010, the National Labor Relations Board, an independent federal agency that enforces the Act, began receiving charges in its regional offices related to employer social media policies and to specific instances of discipline for Facebook postings.


Following investigations, the agency found reasonable cause to believe that some policies and disciplinary actions violated federal labor law, and the NLRB Office of General Counsel issued complaints against employers alleging unlawful conduct. In other cases, investigations found that the communications were not protected and so disciplinary actions did not violate the Act.


General Counsel memos

To ensure consistent enforcement actions, and in response to requests from employers for guidance in this developing area, Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon released three memos in 2011 and 2012 detailing the results of investigations in dozens of social media cases.


The first report, issued on August 18, 2011, described 14 cases. In four cases involving employees’ use of Facebook, the Office of General Counsel found that the employees were engaged in "protected concerted activity" because they were discussing terms and conditions of employment with fellow employees. In five other cases involving Facebook or Twitter posts, the activity was found to be unprotected. In one case, it was determined that a union engaged in unlawful coercive conduct when it videotaped interviews with employees at a nonunion jobsite about their immigration status and posted an edited version on YouTube and the Local Union’s Facebook page. In five cases, some provisions of employers’ social media policies were found to be overly-broad. A final case involved an employer’s lawful policy restricting its employees’ contact with the media.


The second report, issued Jan 25, 2012, also looked at 14 cases, half of which involved questions about employer policies. Five of those policies were found to be unlawfully broad, one was lawful, and one was found to be lawful after it was revised. The remaining cases involved discharges of employees after they posted comments to Facebook. Several discharges were found to be unlawful because they flowed from unlawful policies. But in one case, the discharge was upheld despite an unlawful policy because the employee’s posting was not work-related. The report underscored two main points regarding the NLRB and social media:

  • Employer policies should not be so sweeping that they prohibit the kinds of activity protected by federal labor law, such as the discussion of wages or working conditions among employees.

  • An employee’s comments on social media are generally not protected if they are mere gripes not made in relation to group activity among employees.

The third report, issued May 30, 2012, examined seven employer policies governing the use of social media by employees. In six cases, the General Counsel’s office found some provisions of the employer’s social media policy to be lawful and others to be unlawful. In the seventh case, the entire policy was found to be lawful. Provisions were found to be unlawful when they interfered with the rights of employees under the National Labor Relations Act, such as the right to discuss wages and working conditions with co-workers.

Some of the early social media cases were settled by agreement between the parties. Others proceeded to trial before the agency’s Administrative Law Judges. Several parties then appealed those decisions to the Board in Washington D.C.


NLRB Board decisions

In the fall of 2012, the Board began to issue decisions in cases involving discipline for social media postings. Board decisions are significant because they establish precedent in novel cases such as these.


In the first such decision, issued on September 28, 2012, the Board found that the firing of a BMW salesman for photos and comments posted to his Facebook page did not violate federal labor law. The question came down to whether the salesman was fired exclusively for posting photos of an embarrassing accident at an adjacent Land Rover dealership, which did not involve fellow employees, or for posting mocking comments and photos with co-workers about serving hot dogs at a luxury BMW car event. Both sets of photos were posted to Facebook on the same day; a week later, the salesman was fired. The Board agreed with the Administrative Law Judge that the salesman was fired solely for the photos he posted of a Land Rover incident, which was not concerted activity and so was not protected.


In the second decision, issued December 14, 2012, the Board found that it was unlawful for a non-profit organization to fire five employees who participated in Facebook postings about a coworker who intended to complain to management about their work performance. In its analysis, the Board majority applied settled Board law to social media and found that the Facebook conversation was concerted activity and was protected by the National Labor Relations Act.

Comentarios


What does a Security Guard do?

Security Guards are typically employed by private individuals or businesses to protect people, property and assets. Their regular duties can vary from position to position depending on the needs of their employer, but they’re often required to physically monitor or patrol an area and ensure the safety of the people within the home or business. Some Security Guards work as part of a team, while others work independently. Security Guards can be freelancers, internal employees or contractors from a security company.

 

Security Guard Job Description: Top Duties and Qualifications

A Security Guard, or Security Officer, is responsible for protecting a person, organization or asset in the case of an incident. Their duties include monitoring a specific area, evicting trespassers and writing reports detailing any occurrences during their shift.

Security Guard duties and responsibilities

The overall duty of a Security Guard is to protect a company’s property, employees and visitors. Here are some of their typical daily responsibilities that you can include in a job description:

  • Patrolling and monitoring activities on the company’s premises regularly to discourage criminals and ensure the environment is safe and secure

  • Evicting trespassers and violators and detaining perpetrators while following legal protocols before relevant authorities arrive to take over

  • Controlling the entrance and departure of employees, visitors and vehicles according to protocols

  • Monitoring surveillance cameras to watch out for any disruptions or unlawful activities

  • Providing detailed reports on daily activities and any incidents that may have occurred to management

  • Testing security systems and, if needed, operating X-ray machines and metal detectors

  • Using provided communication devices such as two-way radios in a clear and concise manner

  • Performing CPR or first aid when needed

Security Guard salary expectations

A Security Guard makes an average of $12.92 per hour. This pay rate may vary depending on factors such as experience, education, certifications and additional skills. Unionized Security Guards make anywhere from $17.00 on a low end to over $30.00 an hour plus benefits based on the job type and location. For example the United Federation LEOS-PBA Paragon Security officers under our Paragon Protective Service Officers National Union, working at the federal buildings in New York City make $30.50 an hour plus they receive full benefits.

United Federation LEOS-PBA Law Enforcement Officers Security & Police Benevolent Association LEOS-PBA

Looking to Join or Form a Security Guard Union 
in your State or work location?

If so, Complete the Form Below Today!

Security Guard skills and qualifications

In order to ensure the safety of a company and its assets, a Security Guard should have the following skills and qualifications:

  • Excellent knowledge of security protocols

  • Ability to operate security systems and emergency equipment

  • Exceptional interpersonal skills

  • Advanced verbal and written communication skills

  • Ability to work alone or as part of a team

  • Ability to solve problems as they arise

  • Attention to detail

  • Ability to react appropriately in stressful situations

Security Guard education and training requirements

Unlike many other professional roles, the right candidate for a Security Guard position doesn’t need to have a degree. Most employers will consider applicants with a high school diploma or GED certificate. Companies typically give priority to candidates with a certification, a Security Guard license or security training. Candidates should also be trained in first aid and self-defense. For higher-level roles, employers may look for candidates with a four-year degree in criminal justice or a related field.

Security Guard experience requirements

Candidates applying for a Security Guard role should have at least a year of work experience. Employers may prefer applicants who have worked in the police force or the army or those who have previous experience as a Security Guard, Security Officer or another similar role. Candidates should also have demonstrable experience working with security systems, be proficient in Microsoft Office and know how to write reports.

CONTACT THE

UNITED FEDERATION

LEOS-PBA - DC

 

Address

1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, 10th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20006

Phone
Office / Fax: (202) 595-3510
Organizing: (800) 516-0094

 

UFSPSO: (914) 941-4103

Fax: (914) 941-44722

NUSPO: (202) 499-3956

Fax: (202) 499-3956

NUNSO: (815) 900-9944

Fax: (815) 900-9944

PSONU: (877) - 60-PSONU

FAX:  (877) -607-7668

FPSOA: (202)-595-3510

Fax: (202) 595-3510

UFK9H  (800) 516-0094

Email

organizing@leospba.org

CONTACT EAST COAST

Address

New York City Office

17 State Street, 40th Floor

New York, NY 10004

Long Island Office

220 Old Country Road #2

Mineola, NY 11501

 

Phone
Office / Fax: (212) 457-1010
Organizing: (800) 516-0094

Email
organizing@leospba.org

CONTACT WEST COAST

Address

Los Angeles Office

ARCO Tower 1055 West 7th Street, 33rd Floor (Penthouse) Los Angeles, CA 90017

Phone
Office / Fax: (213) 205-1855
Organizing: (800) 516-0094

Hawaii Guam Saipan 808-212-9831

Email

organizing @leospba.org

Site Map

Lally & Misir LLP

Address

The Nassau Building

220 Old Country Road #2

Mineola, NY 11501

Phone: (516) 741-2666

Fax: (516) 742-8533

Website: https://www.lallymisir.co

BEINS AXELROD

Address

1717 K Street N.W.  Suite 1120 

Washington DC 20006 

Phone: (202) 328-7222

Fax: (202) 328-7030 

Website: http://www.beinsaxelrod.com

© 2022 by Security Guard Union | United Federation LEOS-PBA  all rights reserved

bottom of page